Is depopulation the only solution to the worlds financial crisis?

You have caused quite a stir with this question, as you raised sensitive issues here.

But I do not think we need to worry about the number of people, countries, childbirth, etc.

What we need to worry about how these people are connected to each other.

The root cause of the financial crisis, as actually for any crisis we see around us is the corrupted relationship between people.

We are all selfish and egoistic and the only relationship we are concerned about, how to exploit our fellow humans for our self benefit.

At the same time the world has become global, and we are so interdependent that we cannot survive without the help of everybody else.

So the solution to the crisis is the correction of how we relate to each other, our attitude from egoistic to caring and giving. Trust me with our present attitude it would not matter how much we reduce the world population we would still find reasons to hate and fight.

The suggested solution might sound too idealistic, but what do we have to lose, do you see any other viable solution out there?

Here is a 4 minutes video you might find helpful:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g94iWT2SI鈥?/a>

I hope it helps, all the best.Is depopulation the only solution to the worlds financial crisis?
Well, in other words you want to be like china, how are we going to depopulate this country anyway?
Hitler tried that.Is depopulation the only solution to the worlds financial crisis?
Who would you prefer to start with?
Fire up the Ovens!

Arbech Macht Frei!Is depopulation the only solution to the worlds financial crisis?
start drawing lots.
'DE-Population'? That's a very dicey term. Especially considering some of the things that are distinct possibilities for us right now. And who decides what, and how do we go about that? I think that could turn out VERY badly for a lot of people.



But if you want to talk about birth control, limit to a certain amount (maybe 2) etc., then I think that is something people should be considering.
Haven't you guys already been doing that for over 30 years?



50,000,000 Innocent little lives destroyed, because it was inconvenient for you to use birth control, and to take care of your baby.
Sure. Are you volunteering? How do propose to create this "depopulation"? War? Libs don't fight. YOUR suggestion?



Having said all that, I think the world's population should be about four billion MAX.
no people

no crisis

what a great idea
questions like that show that you just might have a clue to the end game we are now facing.
If you read the Book of Revelation, you will see that God is going to depopulate the world soon.
Don't you think that with all the labs in the world that at least one has come up with an Airborne germ that kills within 72 hours? can not be vaccinated against and thrives in high populated area's? Oh it's out there.
The problem is not the number of people but the number of people who get elected and then heap one burden after another on private industry and then lament when those businesses fail.



As far as population size goes, there is one simple fact you need to keep in mind. Overpopulation is another hoax foisted on the world by the Baby Boomer generation. Did you ever see the movie, "Soylent Green"? That was a story of overpopulation that was supposed to happen in the 1990's.

Here is something to think about. If you took the entire population of the world, divided them up into four person families, placed them in three bedroom houses on lots 50 X 100 feet in area, they would take up about as much space as the State of Texas. The world is a pretty big place. It is no where near overpopulated by people.



*
Unfortunately too many of our financial systems are set up with the idea of a growing population. If the growth were to stop, the system fails. Best example, Social Security, the classic Ponzi scam. (It is OK for the government to run a Ponzi scam, but no one else.)



Also think about a stabilized population with no growth. We would need no new houses. There goes millions of jobs building houses. Same with businesses, no growth. The only way a new business could succeed is if an old business went out of business. Car sales would stagnate as it is only the young who feel you need a new car every 3-5 years.



If population dropped, we would have an excess of what we needed. Values of land, homes, etc would drop. And most people are not willing to sell at a loss so there goes the entire real estate market. Or people would just turn into squatters knowing the owners are probably dead.



But not to worry, if we do not get controlled fusion power within the next 25-50 years it will be Soylent Green time......yummy...
I just bought a zx 900 ninja sport-bike today ,,it came with a warning something about I could get killed on such a bike!!!!! DINO could be depopulated quickly my dear. happy holidays
NWO says you're first. When is depopulation EVER the answer? Humans are natural born SOLVERS, not devolvers. It's much more human to solve the problem by putting the billions of heads that we've got here on Earth (chances are we have at least one brainiac in the bunch - Not Obama btw) than to eliminate them all. Duh??
the population has nothing to do with it. unemployment rate is still below 10%. we need workers to keep things running. the cause of the financial crisis is govt, corporations, and citizens spending more than they can afford to spend. for some reason, people think they have the right to a home and everything in it. a home is a privilege.
According to the New World Order allumni, and the Bilderberg group it is the cure all final solution.

Their ultimate goal is a total earth population of 500,000.

This is no conspiracy, or secret, but public information for anyone who searches to find.

WWIII is likely to start if we stay on our globalization conquest of the world. 1.2 million Iraqi's already dead since we invaded Iraq...Looks like we are on our way!

http://www.redicecreations.com/specialre鈥?/a>
That's about as smart as bleeding a patient until he heals. The sickness sticks around until the patient dies.
No. Keynesian economic policy can work on our economic problems. But the world may still be overpopulated (in that we use a unsustainable amount of natural resources) but I just think that the answer to that is smarter individual choices, education, and smarter environmental policy.
Depopulation has long been a goal of the ruling elite aristocracy. They believe that their bloodlines are superior compared to the rest of humanity. They feel that the majority of the general population are lower humans to be exterminated. So be careful what you ask for because you just might get it.
NO! NO! NO! . However, the One World Government people think so.( It,s going to happen though.) The problem They,re having is How ,When ,and by what means will this come about. It's not a matter of money at all. It is a matter of resources to support the world population of people. AND who will support the

government( no questions) the privileged ; as servents. George Bush even quoted HITLER (His mentor) as a reason to inact The Homeland Security Bill.
No, the solution to the worlds financial crisis is the fact that none of the nations are using real money. They are using fiat money, basically paper. When you build an economy on paper, eventually the greed of the politicians and the bankers results in inflation. Besides inflation, investments are made with "money" that doesn't exist. And on top of that, fractional reserve banking - the ability of a bank to loan our more money than it has in assets.



The people of the world have little understanding of classical economics today, and are easy prey for criminal bankers and criminal politicians.



The only solution is to return to honest money. This means gold and silver, and certificates that are redeemable in gold and silver. The Founders knew this, and that why they included the provision that no state shall make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment for debt.



We have allowed these criminals to create a private bank (the Federal Reserve) which prints debt notes out of nothing. These same criminals stole our gold in 1933. These are the primary causes of the financial problems we face. It has nothing to do with population.
Well, first one would have to show that the world is in fact "overpopulated". Its not, and Overpopulation is an unfounded myth. Human population rate growth peaked around 1970, and has declined ever since:



http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Ar鈥?/a>



http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008鈥?/a>



Meaning, we are reproducing less and less every year. Also, statistically, a country the size of Australia can hold every human being on the planet and still with enough land for each person to farm his own food. This is not overpopulation.



Also, the amount of people in the world has NOTHING to do with the economic situation. The financial crisis was caused by CENTRAL BANKS like the Federal Reserve, which have slowly been destroying the value of the dollar, and thus the entire economy.



Its funny though, because the same men who run the Federal Reserve are also members of an organization called the "Bilderberg Group," which promotes population control and Eugenics.



Hmmmm, does anyone else have a funny feeling they are creating this economic collapse on purpose in order to convince the public that we need to reduce the population?



I say, to those who think population reduction is a good idea, how about you put your money where your mouth is and go jump off a cliff?



And then they'll say, "but my life is more important than yours", and that's when we "lowly breeders" take up arms and send these elitists straight to hell where they belong.
no - keeping the government from creating multi-decade ponzi schemes is the solution



This crisis was created by federal REGULATION requiring the mortgage industry to lend to people that were not qualified borrowers



the result is a mess, not "getting people invested in property" as it was professed to accomplish - this is proof that the government should NOT meddle in the markets
I will be unloved for this, but here goes:



No.



Not "depopulation".



Perhaps a voluntary respect for nature's 'prescribed' limits, instead.



Nature never permitted more than 300M people at a time.



Today's population - nearly 7,000M - is at least 23 times that balance point.



Common-sense attrition will grant a quick return to that balance point.



...
maybe not, but that's the one they're working on. no long straws in this country.
It wouldn't hurt.
Yes.

Its the final solution.